The Wizards' Big Three Has Never Played Together. Everything Depends on How Fast That Changes
The Wizards' Big Three Has Never Played Together. Everything Depends on How Fast That Changes
The most interesting Wizards story of the past week wasn't a trade or a signing. It was a question, asked plainly by Bullets Forever on Sept. 10: Are the Wizards deep?
It's the right question, and it cuts to the heart of what Washington actually built this year. The roster now includes Trae Young, acquired and then signed to a four-year, $212 million deal, All-Star big man Anthony Davis, rookie AJ Dybantsa and third-year center Alex Sarr. That collection of names is why a FanSided NBA piece this week argued the Wizards "could create basketball magic," and why a separate piece insisted the Davis trade "keeps getting better." It's also why the same week produced a companion argument: magic can't happen until a glaring issue gets solved.
The name recognition is real. The availability isn't.
Look at what the 2025 data actually shows. Davis appeared in just 20 games, averaging 20.4 points, 11.1 rebounds and 1.6 blocks. Young logged only 15 games, at 17.9 points and 8.0 assists. Sarr, the most durable of the three, played 48 games with 16.3 points, 7.4 rebounds and 2.0 blocks. Davis, notably, has still never suited up for Washington at all.
So when observers claim this team is deep, the skepticism is fair β depth in theory and depth in practice are different things, and Washington's projected core has spent more time in treatment rooms than on the floor together. The Wizards went 17-65 last season, scoring 112.9 points per game while surrendering 124.9, a minus-12.0 point differential. That's the baseline being repaired.
The league context is worth noticing, too.
The NBA's punishment of the Clippers over the Kawhi Leonard cap-circumvention case β five first-round picks stripped, a $30 million fine on Steve Ballmer, suspensions at the top β dominated the sport's news cycle. The Wizards aren't participants in that mess, but they're indirectly part of the story, as Wiz of Awes noted. For a franchise that has spent years accumulating assets and clearing its books, the Clippers' fallout is a reminder of how quickly a contender can lose its draft ammunition β and, by contrast, how deliberately Washington has managed its own.
Off the floor, the organization added to its front office this week, promoting Amber Nichols to vice president of basketball operations and personnel, per a HoopsHype report.
What the market thinks.
BetMGM lists Washington at 15,000 to win the title β the same neighborhood as Phoenix, and far behind co-favorites San Antonio and Oklahoma City at 260 each. The season win total sits at 34.5, with the over at -105 and the under at -115. In plain terms: the books see a substantial step forward from 17 wins, but not a leap into contention. That's a reasonable read on a team whose improvement is tied to health as much as talent.
The calendar turns quickly.
Washington's first five scheduled dates begin Oct. 8 at New York against the Knicks, followed by home games against Detroit (Oct. 10) and Brooklyn (Oct. 12), a road trip to New Orleans (Oct. 17) and a home date with Milwaukee (Oct. 21). Those early games won't decide a season, but they'll start answering the only question that matters: whether Davis, Young, Dybantsa and Sarr can share a floor long enough to make the depth argument real.
Until then, the Wizards have the most intriguing roster in the East and the least proven health record in it. Both things are true. Only one of them can win out.
